Wiki Entity Template¶
Use this when an indexed term, phrase, motif, or other durable thing has enough identity or cross-project reuse to deserve a canonical entity file under entities/.
Not every Lexicon row needs one.
---
id: concept:example
title: Example
slug: example
type: concept | phrase | motif | source | artifact | other
status: seed | working | established | retired | composted
provenance: origin-unverified
provenance_confidence: low
visibility: public
projects: []
aliases: []
related: []
evolved_from: []
canonical: null
first_known: "unknown"
first_known_source: unknown
---
Use quoted ISO strings for known dates, for example first_known: "2026-09-05", so metadata remains portable across YAML/JSON tooling.
Before creating a public entity from material that originated privately, follow the Visibility Policy. Private-to-public movement is an explicit promotion decision; uncertain material stays private.
Example¶
Short definition¶
One or two sentences answering: what does this mean here?
Why it matters¶
What problem does the entity solve, distinction does it preserve, or relationship does it make visible?
Ecosystem use¶
- Project A: how it appears there.
- Project B: how that treatment differs.
Project labels should match PROJECTS.md exactly. Generated project lenses will use these relationships without copying the entity into project-specific folders.
Provenance¶
What is currently known about the wording and its history? Link evidence where public evidence exists. Use first known rather than first unless authorship has actually been established.
Evolution¶
Use dated metadata or concise chronology when useful:
YYYY-MM — first known appearance
YYYY-MM — renamed / expanded / challenged
Related¶
Put related entity slugs in front matter. The website generator creates related links and reverse backlinks automatically.
Canonical substantive home¶
If a project repository owns the full argument, implementation, research, policy, or canon, put that public URL in canonical. The Wiki entity remains an orientation/relationship layer rather than a duplicate copy.
Open questions¶
What remains unresolved, contested, or worth testing?